| FCGSX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +779.92% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +24.30% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +20.38% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 1.19 |
| Deepest drawdown | -39.30% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2021-11-19 → 2022-10-14 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 8.14% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +779.92% in total (+24.30% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -39.30% from 2021-11-19 to 2022-10-14. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-32.15%), its best 2020 (+69.74%).
| Year | FCGSX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +28.69% |
| 2025 | +25.80% |
| 2024 | +38.05% |
| 2023 | +45.91% |
| 2022 | -32.15% |
| 2021 | +24.06% |
| 2020 | +69.74% |
| 2019 | +39.73% |
| 2018 | -3.76% |
| 2017 | +37.52% |
| 2016 | +2.11% |
+779.92% in total, which works out to +24.30% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -32.15% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2020 (+69.74%).
-39.30%, from a peak on 2021-11-19 to a trough on 2022-10-14. From that trough it took 481 days (about 15.8 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 8.14% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say FCGSX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -39.30% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.