| CEMGX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +140.54% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +16.57% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.55 |
| Deepest drawdown | -39.66% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2018-01-26 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 0.74% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +140.54% in total (+9.18% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -39.66% from 2018-01-26 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-16.60%), its best 2025 (+30.26%).
| Year | CEMGX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +21.94% |
| 2025 | +30.26% |
| 2024 | +8.42% |
| 2023 | +25.17% |
| 2022 | -16.60% |
| 2021 | +5.73% |
| 2020 | +7.61% |
| 2019 | +18.51% |
| 2018 | -16.43% |
| 2017 | +28.54% |
| 2016 | -7.63% |
+140.54% in total, which works out to +9.18% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -16.60% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2025 (+30.26%).
-39.66%, from a peak on 2018-01-26 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 289 days (about 9.5 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 0.74% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say CEMGX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -39.66% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.
More in International · Countries: HEWJ · OPPJ · EWT · Funds