| VMVLX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +232.39% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +14.33% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.89 |
| Deepest drawdown | -35.57% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-01-17 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 1.90% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +232.39% in total (+12.76% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -35.57% from 2020-01-17 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2018 (-4.08%), its best 2021 (+25.92%).
| Year | VMVLX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +16.21% |
| 2025 | +15.59% |
| 2024 | +16.86% |
| 2023 | +9.16% |
| 2022 | -1.21% |
| 2021 | +25.92% |
| 2020 | +2.49% |
| 2019 | +25.73% |
| 2018 | -4.08% |
| 2017 | +16.80% |
| 2016 | +8.02% |
+232.39% in total, which works out to +12.76% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2018 — its calendar-year return was -4.08% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2021 (+25.92%).
-35.57%, from a peak on 2020-01-17 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 256 days (about 8.4 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 1.90% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say VMVLX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -35.57% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.