| UMI | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +217.25% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +13.94% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +20.59% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.68 |
| Deepest drawdown | -48.08% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-01-21 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 6.02% (as of 2026-10-06) |
Over the 8.8 years to 2026-10-06 the fund returned +217.25% in total (+13.94% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -48.08% from 2020-01-21 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2018 (-10.64%), its best 2024 (+43.00%).
| Year | UMI |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +23.60% |
| 2025 | +5.08% |
| 2024 | +43.00% |
| 2023 | +14.58% |
| 2022 | +20.76% |
| 2021 | +21.03% |
| 2020 | -8.24% |
| 2019 | +21.05% |
| 2018 | -10.64% |
| 2017 | +2.76% |
+217.25% in total, which works out to +13.94% a year over the 9 years to 2026-10-06. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2018 — its calendar-year return was -10.64% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2024 (+43.00%).
-48.08%, from a peak on 2020-01-21 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 343 days (about 11.3 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 6.02% of its share price (as of 2026-10-06). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say UMI is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -48.08% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.