| RLCAX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +189.94% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +11.23% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +15.29% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.73 |
| Deepest drawdown | -37.83% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-01-17 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 9.63% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +189.94% in total (+11.23% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -37.83% from 2020-01-17 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2018 (-9.32%), its best 2026 (+22.18%).
| Year | RLCAX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +22.18% |
| 2025 | +14.69% |
| 2024 | +16.33% |
| 2023 | +15.31% |
| 2022 | -7.26% |
| 2021 | +21.95% |
| 2020 | +2.11% |
| 2019 | +19.24% |
| 2018 | -9.32% |
| 2017 | +15.53% |
| 2016 | +6.92% |
+189.94% in total, which works out to +11.23% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2018 — its calendar-year return was -9.32% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2026 (+22.18%).
-37.83%, from a peak on 2020-01-17 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 283 days (about 9.3 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 9.63% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say RLCAX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -37.83% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.