| QCERX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +321.28% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +15.47% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +15.86% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.98 |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.50% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-02-12 → 2020-03-20 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 11.78% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +321.28% in total (+15.47% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -33.50% from 2020-02-12 to 2020-03-20. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-15.57%), its best 2023 (+26.30%).
| Year | QCERX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +23.31% |
| 2025 | +23.66% |
| 2024 | +23.07% |
| 2023 | +26.30% |
| 2022 | -15.57% |
| 2021 | +25.70% |
| 2020 | +14.99% |
| 2019 | +24.42% |
| 2018 | -10.76% |
| 2017 | +24.37% |
| 2016 | +5.46% |
+321.28% in total, which works out to +15.47% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -15.57% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2023 (+26.30%).
-33.50%, from a peak on 2020-02-12 to a trough on 2020-03-20. From that trough it took 159 days (about 5.2 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 11.78% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say QCERX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -33.50% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.