| PRPZX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +112.67% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +7.84% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +22.50% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.35 |
| Deepest drawdown | -62.26% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2017-02-14 → 2020-03-18 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 8.93% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +112.67% in total (+7.84% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -62.26% from 2017-02-14 to 2020-03-18. Its worst calendar year was 2020 (-24.08%), its best 2021 (+40.50%).
| Year | PRPZX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.69% |
| 2025 | +7.20% |
| 2024 | +20.04% |
| 2023 | +13.06% |
| 2022 | +20.42% |
| 2021 | +40.50% |
| 2020 | -24.08% |
| 2019 | +15.25% |
| 2018 | -14.16% |
| 2017 | -4.35% |
| 2016 | +2.19% |
+112.67% in total, which works out to +7.84% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2020 — its calendar-year return was -24.08% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2021 (+40.50%).
-62.26%, from a peak on 2017-02-14 to a trough on 2020-03-18. From that trough it took 450 days (about 14.8 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 8.93% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say PRPZX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -62.26% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.