| MLCPX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +110.73% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +7.74% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +28.06% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.28 |
| Deepest drawdown | -72.97% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2017-02-15 → 2020-03-18 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 5.46% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +110.73% in total (+7.74% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -72.97% from 2017-02-15 to 2020-03-18. Its worst calendar year was 2020 (-28.64%), its best 2021 (+42.72%).
| Year | MLCPX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +23.87% |
| 2025 | +1.69% |
| 2024 | +33.60% |
| 2023 | +18.84% |
| 2022 | +32.35% |
| 2021 | +42.72% |
| 2020 | -28.64% |
| 2019 | +6.11% |
| 2018 | -22.87% |
| 2017 | -8.82% |
| 2016 | +4.75% |
+110.73% in total, which works out to +7.74% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2020 — its calendar-year return was -28.64% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2021 (+42.72%).
-72.97%, from a peak on 2017-02-15 to a trough on 2020-03-18. From that trough it took 811 days (about 26.6 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 5.46% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say MLCPX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -72.97% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.