| FQLSX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +187.90% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +14.48% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.83 |
| Deepest drawdown | -31.26% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-02-12 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 4.56% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 9.3 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +187.90% in total (+12.05% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -31.26% from 2020-02-12 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-18.62%), its best 2019 (+25.96%).
| Year | FQLSX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.79% |
| 2025 | +22.80% |
| 2024 | +17.88% |
| 2023 | +21.04% |
| 2022 | -18.62% |
| 2021 | +16.86% |
| 2020 | +18.36% |
| 2019 | +25.96% |
| 2018 | -8.33% |
| 2017 | +10.11% |
+187.90% in total, which works out to +12.05% a year over the 9 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -18.62% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2019 (+25.96%).
-31.26%, from a peak on 2020-02-12 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 142 days (about 4.7 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 4.56% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say FQLSX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -31.26% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.