SeeFundsee funds clearly 🔍
Saved Sign in

INFL vs SECT

Data as of 2026-09-25 · comparing INFL and SECT · window 2021-01-12 → 2026-09-25 (5.7 years) · returns assume dividends reinvested, net of fund fees · Market Data from Tiingo.com

Side by side

INFLSECT
Total return+121.6%+213.6%
Annualised (CAGR)+15.0%+13.5%
Volatility (annualised)+17.3%+15.9%
Sharpe (rf = 0)0.860.85
Deepest drawdown-21.3%-38.1%
Drawdown peak → trough2022-04-20 → 2022-09-262020-02-20 → 2020-03-23

Same window, same method: SECT fell further at its worst (-38.1%) than INFL (-21.3%). That difference — not the headline return — is usually what decides whether an investor stays in the fund through the bad part.

Every calendar year

▲▲▲▼▲▼
Calendar-year returns (net of fees, dividends reinvested)
YearINFLSECT
2026+16.7%+12.7%
2025+18.3%+17.8%
2024+23.3%+18.6%
2023+1.6%+21.1%
2022+2.6%-12.8%
2021+24.8%+28.9%
2020—+15.6%
2019—+28.1%
2018—-9.7%
2017—+9.4%

What this page does not say

It does not say which one to own. Two funds can look identical here and differ in what they hold, how they are taxed, or how they behave in the next drawdown.

Add a third fund, change the window, model fees: open the comparison tool.

Related: INFL · SECT · all fund pages