| PGSYX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +274.31% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +14.11% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +15.52% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.91 |
| Deepest drawdown | -33.40% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2020-02-12 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 10.08% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +274.31% in total (+14.11% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -33.40% from 2020-02-12 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2018 (-15.89%), its best 2025 (+41.54%).
| Year | PGSYX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +16.57% |
| 2025 | +41.54% |
| 2024 | +11.90% |
| 2023 | +17.09% |
| 2022 | -9.44% |
| 2021 | +24.30% |
| 2020 | +18.33% |
| 2019 | +23.80% |
| 2018 | -15.89% |
| 2017 | +22.54% |
| 2016 | +1.87% |
+274.31% in total, which works out to +14.11% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2018 — its calendar-year return was -15.89% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2025 (+41.54%).
-33.40%, from a peak on 2020-02-12 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 158 days (about 5.2 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 10.08% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say PGSYX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -33.40% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.