| IGLB | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +11.0% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +1.1% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +11.9% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.09 |
| Deepest drawdown | -34.1% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2021-09-22 → 2022-10-24 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 5.70% (as of 2026-09-29) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-09-29 the fund returned +11.0% in total (+1.1% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -34.1% from 2021-09-22 to 2022-10-24. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-25.4%), its best 2019 (+23.2%).
| Year | IGLB |
|---|---|
| 2026 | -5.9% |
| 2025 | +7.5% |
| 2024 | -1.5% |
| 2023 | +11.0% |
| 2022 | -25.4% |
| 2021 | -1.7% |
| 2020 | +13.3% |
| 2019 | +23.2% |
| 2018 | -6.9% |
| 2017 | +12.2% |
| 2016 | -6.2% |
+11.0% in total, which works out to +1.1% a year over the 10 years to 2026-09-29. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -25.4% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2019 (+23.2%).
-34.1%, from a peak on 2021-09-22 to a trough on 2022-10-24. As of 2026-09-29 it had not climbed back to that earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 5.70% of its share price (as of 2026-09-29). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say IGLB is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -34.1% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.