| GCIUX | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +176.07% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +10.69% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +15.50% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.69 |
| Deepest drawdown | -39.84% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2018-01-26 → 2020-03-23 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 6.97% (as of 2026-10-02) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-10-02 the fund returned +176.07% in total (+10.69% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -39.84% from 2018-01-26 to 2020-03-23. Its worst calendar year was 2018 (-15.71%), its best 2025 (+40.64%).
| Year | GCIUX |
|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.79% |
| 2025 | +40.64% |
| 2024 | +9.52% |
| 2023 | +20.85% |
| 2022 | -14.88% |
| 2021 | +11.69% |
| 2020 | +7.85% |
| 2019 | +18.45% |
| 2018 | -15.71% |
| 2017 | +29.70% |
| 2016 | -0.08% |
+176.07% in total, which works out to +10.69% a year over the 10 years to 2026-10-02. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2018 — its calendar-year return was -15.71% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2025 (+40.64%).
-39.84%, from a peak on 2018-01-26 to a trough on 2020-03-23. From that trough it took 281 days (about 9.2 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 6.97% of its share price (as of 2026-10-02). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say GCIUX is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -39.84% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.
More in International · Countries: HEWJ · OPPJ · EWT · Funds