| EMLC | |
|---|---|
| Total return | +16.0% |
| Annualised (CAGR) | +1.5% |
| Volatility (annualised) | +10.5% |
| Sharpe (rf = 0) | 0.14 |
| Deepest drawdown | -26.5% |
| Drawdown peak → trough | 2021-01-05 → 2022-10-24 |
| Dividend yield (12m distributions) | 6.40% (as of 2026-09-29) |
Over the 10.0 years to 2026-09-29 the fund returned +16.0% in total (+1.5% a year), with a deepest drawdown of -26.5% from 2021-01-05 to 2022-10-24. Its worst calendar year was 2022 (-10.6%), its best 2025 (+18.8%).
| Year | EMLC |
|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | +18.8% |
| 2024 | -3.0% |
| 2023 | +11.2% |
| 2022 | -10.6% |
| 2021 | -9.7% |
| 2020 | +3.1% |
| 2019 | +9.8% |
| 2018 | -7.6% |
| 2017 | +13.8% |
| 2016 | -5.8% |
+16.0% in total, which works out to +1.5% a year over the 10 years to 2026-09-29. Both figures assume dividends were reinvested and the fund's own fees were already deducted, so they are what an investor would have kept — before tax.
2022 — its calendar-year return was -10.6% (net of fees, dividends reinvested). Its best year was 2025 (+18.8%).
-26.5%, from a peak on 2021-01-05 to a trough on 2022-10-24. From that trough it took 1057 days (about 34.7 months) to climb back to the earlier peak.
Over the last 12 months it distributed 6.40% of its share price (as of 2026-09-29). That is a past distribution, not a promise of future income, and it is already counted in every return figure on this page.
It does not say EMLC is a good or bad fund, and it is not a forecast. Returns above are history: they already include dividends and already exclude the fund's own fees. A drawdown of -26.5% means an investor who bought at the peak would have watched that much value disappear before it recovered — how long that takes is the part most tables leave out.