Percentages are measured from whatever you currently have. After your money falls by half, the missing half is a full 100% gain on what’s left. The deeper the drop, the more brutal the comeback needed. Drag the slider to feel it.
What “needed” means: the percentage rise from the bottom needed just to get back to the old high — assuming no dividends and no new money in between (see the caveats below).
If you lose 20% you don’t need 20% back — you need 25%, because after the loss your base is smaller. This asymmetry is why avoiding deep falls matters as much as chasing gains, and why a fund’s worst drawdown is one of the first numbers worth looking at.
Because percentages are measured from the smaller base after the loss. Regaining the missing half is a full 100% on what remains.
Only if it sits still. Dividends reinvested and added money change the real path — this is the pure price math of returning to the old high.
No — it shows the arithmetic required to break even; whether and when a fund recovers is the future, which can’t be predicted.
More: Guide: maximum drawdown explained · Fee impact calculator · Annualized vs cumulative · All tools